True or False: An 'arrest' must always involve physical restraint or handcuffs.

An arrest does not always require physical restraint or the use of handcuffs. The concept of arrest encompasses the intent of law enforcement officials to take a person into custody, along with that person's understanding that they are not free to leave. An arrest can occur through verbal commands or the display of authority by law enforcement, even if no physical restraint is applied.

In many cases, individuals may be informed that they are under arrest without the immediate use of restraints. Additionally, there are circumstances where an officer may not use physical restraint until the individual actively resists. Therefore, stating that an arrest must always involve physical restraint is inaccurate, making this assertion true. The understanding of what constitutes an arrest can vary depending on the context and specifics of the situation, but the absence of handcuffs or physical restraint does not negate the legality of an arrest.