What type of authority can be inferred from the duties of an agent?

Implied authority arises from the responsibilities and duties that an agent is expected to handle on behalf of a principal. This type of authority is not explicitly stated in a contract but is inferred from the actions of the agent, the nature of the job, or the context in which the agent operates.

For instance, if a bail bondsman is given the responsibility to execute bonds and obtain necessary signatures, they inherently possess the implied authority to take additional steps that are customary or necessary to effectively fulfill that role. Since the agent's duties suggest certain actions should be taken to conduct business properly, those actions fall under implied authority.

Express authority, on the other hand, is specifically granted and clearly outlined in a written or verbal agreement. Ostensible authority, often related to third-party perceptions, refers to situations where a principal creates an appearance that an agent has authority, even if that authority wasn’t granted. Delegated authority involves transferring power from one agent to another, which isn't relevant when discussing inferred duties directly associated with an original agent's responsibilities. Therefore, implied authority is the most appropriate type of authority that aligns with the duties of an agent.